Merrow Conservatives - Return to main page
Home | News | Recent newsletters | Letters & Articles | People | Contact Us | About Merrow |

In this section
- Section Home


Archive
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003

RSS Feed Blog RSS feed


Search this siteSearch this site




RSS FeedsRSS Feeds

- News RSS
- Blog RSS



Friday, 26 August, 2005
Casinos and the democratic deficit

The latest twists and turns in the saga of Michel Harper’s casino are likely to leave many Guildford residents perplexed and wondering who will take the final decision on the proposed development. This uncertainty is the result of a gaping democratic deficit.

Any casino needs three substantive consents – planning permission, a premises licence to sell alcohol and allow entertainment, and a gambling licence. There have been three planning applications, and one was granted on appeal by the Bristol-based Planning Inspectorate.

The premises licence has been obtained, but there are ongoing appeals to the Crown Courts on the opening times and capacity. The number of gambling licences allowed across the country is limited, and the South East Regional Assembly and a government agency will decide where they go in our region.

There is a trend here: unelected inspectors, judges and quangocrats taking decisions, deaf to local opinion. Yet at a recent Borough Licensing Committee, it was agreed on a motion proposed by myself and Cllr Sarah Creedy, that the council should consider introducing a blanket ban on any new casino in Guildford. Councils have this power under the Gambling Act 2005, and any decision cannot be over-ruled – provided due process is followed.

A resolution either way is likely in the latter half of next year after consultation and a fair hearing for all involved. Local people will then be able to call their councillors to account for that decision in the 2007 local elections. Democracy may yet have its day.

Cllr Sheridan Westlake

Permalink

Next Page

Promoted by Jackie Porter on behalf of Merrow Conservatives both at Guildford Conservatives 17A Home Farm Loseley Park Guildford GU3 1HS